On Saturday 27 November 2021, at the Emergency Health and Truth Summit in Northern Ireland, I issued a call for an IMMEDIATE MORATORIUM on the experimental COVID-19 genetic vaccines currently deployed in the UK, especially for children. In my talk, I define a risk-benefit framework in 4 key areas:
Safety – Are the vaccines safe for human consumption?
Efficacy – Do the vaccines protect against infection, transmission, severe disease and death?
Strategic Viability – Will the vaccines provide beneficial immunological memory for the medium and long term and is their universal deployment wise?
Ethics – Have the vaccines been developed, manufactured, tested and marketed ethically?
According to this framework, I judge that the risk from all the experimental COVID-19 genetic vaccines deployed in the UK far outweighs the benefit and conclude that we therefore require an IMMEDIATE MORATORIUM.
On Friday 24 September 2021, I sent the below email to politicians and education bodies in Northern Ireland. I also included an attached copy of my risk assessment.
I am writing today to inform you of the unacceptable risks in deploying the experimental COVID-19 genetic vaccines.
My fully independent, fully referenced biosecurity risk assessment thoroughly expounds upon all the risks documented across the fields of toxicology, molecular biology, virology, immunology and molecular, genomic and statistical epidemiology. It is hosted at alltherisks.com. I've also attached it to this email.
It highlights the exact pathologies associated with these genetic vaccines, explaining precisely how these experimental vaccines damage the body in devastating ways.
It also proves that, even prior to COVID-19, the strategy of mass vaccinating the population with non-sterilising vaccines targeting a highly mutable surface protein (spike) during a pandemic of a mutable RNA virus was already known to be a foolish, reckless and dangerous strategy.
These experimental genetic vaccines are unsafe, do not confer cross-protective immunity and will devastate our society's health, according to the academic literature and data we already have available.
If you disagree that the public deserve to be immediately informed of all the risks, please justify your rationale.
Jonathan Weissman BSc MSc MSc